Overview
Procedure
Toolbox

Anchoring Phenomenon

Materials are made of matter. We can observe misshapen objects, including a crayon, lip balm, and a candle.

Lesson Concept

Analyze and interpet data to determine which properties of materials are best suited for a specific purpose.

Investigative Phenomenon

Crayon marks are difficult to remove from school surfaces. I wonder what materials would work best to remove them?

Standards

Click here for NGSS, CCSS-ELA, and California ELD standards.

Time | Materials | Advance Preparation

Time

145 minutes

Part I35 minutesEngage
Part II45 minutes
30 minutesExplore A
15 minutesExplain A
Part III65 minutes
15 minutesExplain B
20 minutesElaborate
30 minutesEvaluate

Materials

Whole Class

Group (Groups of 4)

  • Tray
  • Sponge (divided into four equal parts)
  • Sandpaper (2 in. x 2 in. piece)
  • Paper towels
  • Sock or felt (2 in. x 2 in. pieces)
  • Cotton balls
  • Paper
  • Wooden block
  • Straws
  • Aluminum foil
  • Wax paper
  • Crayon
  • Two crayon-marked cups (See Advance Preparation)
  • 2.3.G1: Crayon-marked Cup Rubric

Individual

Advance Preparation

  1. Obtain a copy of Rosie Revere, Engineer and Iggy Peck, Architect by Andrea Beaty. You can either purchase or check out from the library.
  2. Gather materials for the Explore stage for each group and put them on the tray.
  3. Prepare two crayon cups for each group. Use a black crayon to cover at least 4 sections of the side of one of the plastic cup. This will enable students to try different materials on different sections of the cup. Use a black crayon to completely cover the bottom of another cup to be used as a control to compare the “cleaned” cups.
  4. Either make one copy per group of 2.3.G1: Crayon-marked Cup Rubric or display it on a chart where everyone can view it.

Part I

Engage (35 minutes)

Analyze and interpret data to determine via cause and effect which properties of materials are best suited for a specific purpose.

  1. Bring the students to a central area. Prompt students to guide you in drawing on chart paper a picture of what the students recall doing to the liquids in Lesson 2: Properties of Liquids. Be sure to label and clarify students’ current thinking and wonderings. Any student questions should be added to the 2.1.C1: Student Question Chart.
  2. Refer to the 2.1.C1: Student Question Chart and engage students in a conversation about what they have learned about solids and liquids that helps them to explain what might have caused the objects to become misshapen. ESRs: I tried different things from my investigation plan. I made a plan, and I tried out my ideas. I had lots of questions, and I got answers after I tried out my plan.
  3. Have a class discussion about how people might solve problems. ESRs: I ask for help. I don’t give up. I make a plan. I think about it. I think about how I could fix it. I try and try again.
  4. TEACHER NOTE

    To facilitate this discussion, it may be helpful to refer to a recent problem that the class has solved or that a group has solved.

  5. Read aloud Rosie Revere, Engineer by Andrea Beaty. Ask, “How does Rosie solve problems? Does Rosie’s solution always work the first time?” ESRs: Rosie tries different materials. Rosie keeps trying different ways. Rosie tests materials to see if they will help her solve a problem. Her solutions don’t always work the first time.
  6. Ask students to think-pair-share as they compare how they solve problems with how Rosie solves problems. Prompt students to notice what is the same and what is different about how Rosie solves problems and how they solve problems.

Part II

Explore A (30 minutes)

Analyze and interpret data to determine via cause and effect which properties of materials are best suited for a specific purpose.

  1. Say to students, “Just as Rosie had a problem to solve, we have a problem to solve at our school. We have had crayon marks show up around our school on different surfaces. How can we clean the crayon marks from our school surfaces?”
  2. TEACHER NOTE

    The problem students are trying to solve is how to remove crayon marks from school surfaces. If there has been a recent episode of crayon marks on desks or other surfaces at the school, use that incident as a setting for the problem. Alternatively, the problem can be set in the context of wanting to recycle the cups for a different purpose in order to establish the need to remove the crayon marks from the cups.

  3. Ask students, “What do you think will clean crayon marks from our school surfaces? Why? How?” ESRs: I can try rubbing it off. I can use a napkin. I can use my shirt. I can use an eraser. I can use water. I can use soap. I think it will work because rubbing takes marks off, and I’ve done it before.
  4. Distribute the tray of materials to each group of four. Allow students time to explore and observe the materials and consider how they could be used to remove the crayon marks from the cups. Have them think-pair-share and then record their observations in a student-designed table (chart) in their science notebook. Observations could include: the sandpaper is rough, the cotton ball is fluffy and white, or the sponge is dry and has holes, etc. Remind students to record their data with the name of the item and its properties.
  5. TEACHER NOTE

    Student data tables should reflect student thinking; therefore, it is not necessary to have them organized in the same way. Select a few data tables for students to display later to the class and have a conversation about which features of the data table make it easier to look at the data and understand the data, e.g., labels and one-to-one correspondence between the item and its properties.

  6. Ask students to use the properties they’ve listed in their table to make a prediction about which of the items might work best to remove the crayon from the cup. Have students write their predictions in their science notebook. Encourage students to back up their claim with what they observed about the properties of the object(s) and how those properties will help clean the crayon marks.
  7. TEACHER NOTE

    As you walk around, assess students’ responses using this rubric.

    3
    2
    1
    Identifies the object, states a property of the object, and explains how that property will help.
    Identifies the object and states a property of the object.
    Identifies the object.
    The _____ (sandpaper) will work the best because it is _____ (rough), and it will rub the crayon mark off the cup completely.
    The _____ (sandpaper) will work the best because it is _____ (rough).
    I will use the ___ (sandpaper).
  8. Allow time for students to test their predictions. Have students record their findings in their science notebooks.
  9. Have the class compare their results to the control cup. Allow students to self-assess their results by using 2.3.G1: Crayon-marked Cup Rubric or the chart on the wall. Construct a class chart to determine the overall best material for cleaning the crayon marks.

Explain A (15 minutes)

Analyze and interpret data to determine via cause and effect which properties of materials are best suited for a specific purpose.

  1. Have students refer to their data tables and the class data table. Ask students, “What properties of these materials were best suited for cleaning the crayon marks from our school surfaces? Why? What patterns did you notice?” Chart student responses.

Part III

Explain B (15 minutes)

Analyze and interpret data to determine via cause and effect which properties of materials are best suited for a specific purpose.

  1. Engage students in a conversation about the crayon problem and the different properties of the materials that helped to clean the crayon off the cup. Facilitate the conversation so that students clarify that there were several different properties that served the same purpose: cleaning. Have students review the way the problem was solved and the way the data were used to determine success in solving the problem.
  2. Ask students to think about other objects used in the classroom and share with a partner the object’s use. Ask, “What are the properties of your object that makes it useful for that purpose?” For example, a student might say that a pencil is used to write, and it’s made of wood to hold it in your hand. Have students think-pair-share about the different properties of the pencil that make it useful for writing. Ask a few students to share an object that was talked about, its purpose, and the properties that made it useful for that purpose. Ask if the object could be made of different materials and still be useful for its purpose.
  3. Refer to the 2.1.C1: Student Question Chart with the questions generated in Lesson 1: Properties of Matter about crayons. Ask students to identify any questions that may have been answered or partially answered or addressed during the investigations. Direct student thinking toward how the misshapen objects were formed and how to prevent it from happening. The student responses will depend on the questions your students generated.

Elaborate (20 minutes)

Analyze and interpret data to determine via cause and effect which properties of materials are best suited for a specific purpose.

  1. Read aloud Iggy Peck, Architect by Andrea Beaty. Ask students: “How does Iggy solve problems? Does Iggy’s solution always work the first time?” ESRs: Iggy was using materials for different purposes. Iggy writes a plan on paper. Iggy keeps trying different ways. Iggy doesn’t give up. Iggy uses evidence from his tests to revise his designs. Iggy teaches his classmates how to solve problems. Iggy’s solutions don’t always work the first time.

Evaluate (30 minutes)

Analyze and interpret data to determine via cause and effect which properties of materials are best suited for a specific purpose.

  1. Turn to the page in Iggy Peck, Architect that begins: “The class was amazed. They stood there uncertain of what they should do.” Display the page. (You may be able to display the book page from a video on the Internet.)
  2. Ask students to evaluate how well the solids that the second-grade students in the story have chosen will work (based on the solid’s properties) for the purpose of building a bridge.
  3. Have students record responses in their science notebook using statements of evidence to represent cause and effect. ESRs: Because sticks are strong and hard and will hold up (or support) a bridge, they are a good choice for building a bridge.
  4. Turn to the page in the book that begins. “And when she came to, Miss Lila Greer knew.” Display the page.
  5. Have students evaluate how well each solid in the bridge would work based on where the solid is in the bridge. Invite students to compare the properties of each part to its function in the bridge, i.e., certain materials are used based on the ability to hold up the bridge. ESRs: The sticks made the bridge strong. The kids in the story needed a strong bridge so they can cross back. The sticks were used to hold up the shoelaces in the bridge because it is their job. I think that that is a good use of the sticks because they are hard (structure) and strong and will hold up the shoelaces.
  6. Have students give an alternative solid that could be used to support the bridge based on the properties (structure) and function of the solid. ESRs: The little boy could have also used a piece of metal in place of the stick because it is also strong and hard (structure) and could help with the job (function) of holding up the shoelaces in the bridge.
  7. Return to the 2.1.C1: Student Question Chart. Have students add responses to any of the questions they have that can now be answered.
  8. Have students reflect on how the children in the stories solved problems. Ask students to think about how some of the children’s ideas may be incorporated into their engineering plans.
  9. Refer to 2.1.H1: Engineering Planning Sheet, which students should have a copy in their science notebooks. Have students begin the Create Phase by attempting to actualize the plan to solve their design problem, which is “How can we keep our three regular objects from becoming misshapen?”

References

Beaty, A., & Roberts, D. (2013). Rosie Revere, Engineer. New York,, NY: Abrams Books for Young Readers.

Beaty, A. (2018). Iggy Peck, Architect. Dreamscape Media.

Resources


Download 2.3.G1